2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1977 Holden Kingswood

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden Kingswood (213 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden Kingswood should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 414 kg more than 1977 Holden Kingswood.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden Kingswood (400 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1977 Holden Kingswood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1977 Holden Kingswood
Make Cadillac Holden
Model CTS Kingswood
Year Released 2006 1977
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 5042 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 179 HP 213 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 232 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1794 kg 1380 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2830 mm