2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1244 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2310 mm |