2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1978 Zastava 132

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 695 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1978 Zastava 132
Make Cadillac Zastava
Model CTS 132
Year Released 2006 1978
Engine Size 3173 cc 1756 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 215 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 142 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2560 mm