2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1978 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 737 kg more than 1978 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1978 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | CTS | 850 K |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 847 cc |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |