2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 250 kg more than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2006 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2006 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1979 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2870 mm |