2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Daihatsu Charade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 860 kg more than 1979 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1979 Daihatsu Charade | |
Make | Cadillac | Daihatsu |
Model | CTS | Charade |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.8 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 21.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 34 L |