2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Chrysler New Yorker
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 5,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler New Yorker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler New Yorker weights approximately 29 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler New Yorker has automatic transmission and 2006 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2006 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler New Yorker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Chrysler New Yorker | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | CTS | New Yorker |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 5191 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3020 mm |
