2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Maserati Merak
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1980 Maserati Merak. (157 HP @ 7100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 390 kg more than 1980 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Maserati Merak | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | Merak |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |