2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 772 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Tercel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2510 mm |