2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2664 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |