2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | CTS | XJR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5343 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 90 L |