2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Hyundai Pony
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Hyundai Pony. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Hyundai Pony would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Hyundai Pony | |
Make | Cadillac | Hyundai |
Model | CTS | Pony |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1236 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |