2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Tiara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Tiara would be higher. At 3,837 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1982 Monteverdi Tiara. (201 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Monteverdi Tiara.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Monteverdi Tiara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Monteverdi |
| Model | CTS | Tiara |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 3837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3080 mm |
