2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 11. (161 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 11.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Renault 11 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | 11 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1397 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |