2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 542 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
Model | CTS | Murena |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |