2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1985 Lancia Y10
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Lancia Y10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Lancia Y10 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1985 Lancia Y10. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Lancia Y10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 742 kg more than 1985 Lancia Y10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1985 Lancia Y10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Lancia Y10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1985 Lancia Y10 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | CTS | Y10 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 70.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 65 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |