2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1985 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1985 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
Model | CTS | Voyager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2860 mm |