2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | CTS | 1700 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 36 L |