2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Chrysler Daytona
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Daytona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Daytona would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Daytona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chrysler Daytona. (243 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chrysler Daytona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Chrysler Daytona | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | CTS | Daytona |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 243 Nm |
| Top Speed | 238 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
