2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Lancia ECV
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 345 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Lancia ECV | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | CTS | ECV |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1757 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 600 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |