2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Chrysler Conquest
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1987 Chrysler Conquest. (185 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Chrysler Conquest. (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Chrysler Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Chrysler Conquest | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | Conquest |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2555 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2450 mm |