2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1988 Chrysler Voyager. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Chrysler Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1988 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | Voyager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |