2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1989 Peugeot Oxia
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Peugeot Oxia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Peugeot Oxia would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Peugeot Oxia (671 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Peugeot Oxia should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1989 Peugeot Oxia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Peugeot Oxia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Peugeot Oxia (726 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1989 Peugeot Oxia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1989 Peugeot Oxia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
| Model | CTS | Oxia |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2849 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 671 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 726 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1140 mm |
