2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Chevrolet S-10
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Chevrolet S-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chevrolet S-10. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Chevrolet S-10 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | CTS | S-10 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4300 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3130 mm |