2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Fiat Punto
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Fiat Punto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Fiat Punto would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Fiat Punto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Fiat Punto. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Fiat Punto.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Fiat Punto | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | Punto |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |