2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Mazda AZ-1
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 758 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | AZ-1 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 834 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2240 mm |