2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Mitsubishi Field Guard | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Field Guard |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2498 cc |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |