2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 422 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |