2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,205 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 2 kg more than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1994 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | CTS | Arcadia |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 3205 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4960 mm |