2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Buick Century
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Buick Century would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1995 Buick Century. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Buick Century.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Buick Century. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Buick Century | |
| Make | Cadillac | Buick |
| Model | CTS | Century |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3100 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1374 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2664 mm |
