2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 41 kg more than 1995 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | CTS | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1950 mm |
