2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 ZAZ Slavuta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 ZAZ Slavuta would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 349 more horse power than 1995 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 ZAZ Slavuta.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1995 ZAZ Slavuta | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZAZ |
| Model | CTS | Slavuta |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1091 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2330 mm |
