2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Ford Synergy 2010
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Synergy 2010. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Ford Synergy 2010 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Synergy 2010 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 999 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
