2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Lada Natacha
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 330 more horse power than 1996 Lada Natacha. (70 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada Natacha, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada Natacha.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Lada Natacha | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | CTS | Natacha |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
