2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Vector M12
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Vector M12 (484 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Vector M12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1996 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Vector M12 | |
Make | Cadillac | Vector |
Model | CTS | M12 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5707 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 484 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |