2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Seat Bolero

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Seat Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Seat Bolero would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Seat Bolero has automatic transmission and 2006 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2006 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Seat Bolero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: