2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | B2500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2990 mm |