2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero. (182 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Pajero |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2970 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |