2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2000 Caterham 21. (230 HP @ 8600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 21. (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
Make | Cadillac | Caterham |
Model | CTS | 21 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1794 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 100 L |