2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Chrysler Howler
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Howler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Howler would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Howler. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Howler.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Howler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Howler. (408 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Howler.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Chrysler Howler | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | Howler |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4700 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 408 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 100 L |