2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 208 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | CTS | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |
