2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada 110 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | CTS | 110 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2500 mm |
