2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 382 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | CTS | Armada |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4310 mm |
