2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Pagani Zonda. (389 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pagani Zonda (569 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Pagani |
| Model | CTS | Zonda |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5987 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |
