2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Subaru STX
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru STX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru STX would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Subaru STX. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Subaru STX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru STX weights approximately 18 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2000 Subaru STX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru STX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru STX. (224 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru STX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Subaru STX | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | CTS | STX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 224 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |