2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Ford Tonka

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 551 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2002 Ford Tonka
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Tonka
Year Released 2006 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 211 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 263 Nm 814 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1302 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 6150 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2370 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 2140 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 4200 mm