2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Holden Jackaroo
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 299 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Holden Jackaroo | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | Jackaroo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 333 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 2045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2770 mm |