2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Saab 9-X
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saab 9-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saab 9-X would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2002 Saab 9-X. (300 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Saab 9-X.
Because 2002 Saab 9-X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saab 9-X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Saab 9-X. (410 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Saab 9-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Saab 9-X | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saab |
| Model | CTS | 9-X |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 410 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 61 L |
