2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Mahindra CL

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 290 kg more than 2003 Mahindra CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 2003 Mahindra CL
Make Cadillac Mahindra
Model CTS CL
Year Released 2006 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 2523 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 211 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 3200 RPM
Torque 263 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1302 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 3360 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2040 mm