2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Citroen C3
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 328 more horse power than 2004 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen C3.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | C3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1360 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |